Meyner and Landis LLP Immigration Law Group
  • 21Jun
    Immigration Reform Comments Off on KEEPING THE DREAM ALIVE!

    In a memorandum written to the directors of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP), Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE), the Obama Administration responded to years of pressure from immigration rights activists by authorizing the use of prosecutorial discretion by these agencies. The order effectively stops the deportation of certain young immigrants in this country, better known as DREAMers.

    DREAMers get their name from the DREAM Act, or the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, which was first introduced as bipartisan legislation in 2001 by Senators Dick Durban (D-Ill.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Initially, it garnered significant support as a novel way to alleviate part of the illegal immigration problem. The central tenant of the act focused on young immigrants of good moral character who were illegally brought into the country by their parents. The act was to provide them with legal residency status under certain conditions, including the completion of at least two years of college or military service, and at least five years of residency in the U.S. prior to the enactment of the legislation. The DREAM Act has since seen several different revisions, but has only been met with delay due to congressional inaction.

    Support for the DREAM Act seemed to be declining with the passage of time. However, in recent months, new legislation and proposals similar to the DREAM Act have begun circulating in Congress. In January, Rep. David Rivera (R-Fla.) introduced the ARMS Act, which would require military service as a condition to obtaining permanent resident status. Rep. Rivera also introduced the STARS Act just last month, an act that would allow undocumented students to receive permanent residency status if they were under the age of 19 at the time of application and subsequently completed a four-year degree.  Meanwhile, Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) has made a proposal to provide non-immigrant visas to young illegal immigrants, though he has yet to specify any details of the legislation. Sen. Rubio has, however, expressed his intent to narrowly tailor the legislation to address Republican immigration concerns with the DREAM act.

    But talks of new legislation similar to the DREAM act came to a standstill after the announcement by the Obama Administration this past Friday. The memo written by the Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, set forth the criteria by which the Department of Homeland Security would exercise its prosecutorial discretion in enforcing immigration laws against those young people who were illegally brought into the U.S. but knew no other country as their home. The outlined criteria mirror that of the DREAM Act to a certain degree. Specifically, the memo states that if an individual: (1) came to the United States under the age of 16; (2) has continuously resided in the U.S. for at least five years preceding the date of the memo and is present in the U.S. on the date of the memo (June 15, 2012); (3) is currently in school, has graduated from high school, has obtained a general education development certificate, or is an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or the Armed Forces of the U.S.; (4) has not been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise poses as threat to national security or public safety; and (5) is not above the age of thirty; he/she should be subject to prosecutorial discretion and should be prevented from being placed into removal proceeding and being removed from the United States.

    “This grant of deferred action is not immunity,” Napolitano said in an interview. “It is not amnesty. It is an exercise of discretion so that these young people are not in the removal system. It will help us to continue to streamline immigration enforcement and ensure that resources are not spent pursuing the removal of low-priority cases involving productive young people.”

    The Obama Administration has stated that the policy change is expected to affect approximately 800,000 immigrants, though a Pew Hispanic Center (a project of the Pew Research Center) study has calculated that up to 1.4 million children and young adults could benefit from the change. This number represents an estimated 12% of the unauthorized immigrant population. 70% of the potential 1.4 million beneficiaries are from Mexico.

    Determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis, suggesting that relief cannot be guaranteed to an illegal immigrant simply because they fit the initial five criteria. Further, the President emphasized the temporary nature of the order and called for Congressional action in creating permanent legislation on this issue. As it stands, the order would become ineffective in two years unless renewed by the next president. Moreover, the order does not actually confer any kind of substantive right, immigration status, or pathway to citizenship. But the Department of Homeland Security has stated that individuals who are granted the deferred action may send applications to the USCIS to determine whether they qualify for work authorization.

    While those granted deferred action in accordance with the new policy are not necessarily on a path to U.S. permanent residency, let alone U.S. citizenship, they at least now are keeping their dream alive.

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 20Jun
    USCIS News Comments Off on USCIS Implements The First Phase of its Electronic Immigration System – ELIS

    With the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) reportedly receiving 6-7 million applications per year, a speedier and more efficient adjudicative process is urgently needed.  In response, USCIS recently launched the first phase of ELIS (short for Electronic Immigration System), which is a web-based system that allows qualifying foreign nationals to electronically file petitions for extending or reinstating certain nonimmigrant visa classifications (B-1, B-2, F-1 M-1 or M-2). It is meant to be more efficient and reliable and, thus, will shorten the processing time of  the above-listed petitions.

    USCIS has plans to expand the scope of ELIS to allow users to electronically file petitions and applications seeking all immigrant and nonimmigrant classifications.

    In addition to shorter processing times, there are other benefits of using ELIS.  For example,  ELIS users have the advantage of paying filing fees online, updating user profiles online, responding to requests for additional evidence electronically, receiving USCIS notifications by way of email or text message (as soon as an adjudicating officer takes action on the pending petition and/or application), and submitting and storing supporting evidence for future use.

    It’s important to note that use of the ELIS is not mandatory for the above-described petitions – the paper filing alternative is still offered along with the previous E-filing system. The difference between the previous E-filing system and ELIS is that the latter is an end-to-end electronically based system, whereas the previous E-filing system still requires applicants to mail the supporting documents to USCIS for the adjudicating officers to review the applications manually, thus increasing the processing time.

    If you have any questions regarding the ELIS, please feel free to contact us.

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 12Jun
    Green Card News, H-1B Visa News, L-1 Visa News, PERM Comments Off on A Heightened Standard of Proof in Employment-Based Petitions

    The recent statistics on PERM processing (the first step of the employment-based green card process) and USCIS adjudication rates in the employment-based visa categories confirm a trend that practitioners have observed and struggled with over the past few years: higher rates of denial, delays in adjudication and increased PERM audits and requests for evidence (“RFEs”). To some, the data suggests that the government is overreacting to the economic conditions in the country, and unnecessarily impeding employers’ ability to retain the best and brightest foreign workers. However, a closer look at the numbers also reveals that we as practitioners have been able to adapt to the heightened standards of proof and are still able to achieve positive results for our clients.

    The 2012 Department of Labor statistics reveal an increase in denial rates of PERM petitions. While the Department denied less than 20% of PERM petitions between 2008 and 2010, that number has climbed to 25% for the fiscal 2011. The same trend is apparent with H-1B, L-1A, and L-1B petitions.  The denial rate for H-1B petitions has grown from 11% in 2007 to 29% in 2009 and 21% in 2010. Although denials dropped to 17% in 2011, the rate of issuance of RFEs increased significantly: from 4% in 2004, to 26% in 2011, peaking at 35% in 2009. For L-1A petitions, the denial rate grew by 6% between 2007 and 2011, and today every second petition is subjected to an RFE. The numbers in the L-1B category are even more disheartening: denials increased by 20% between 2007 and 2011, while the RFE rate nearly quadrupled for the same period.

    These are clear examples of how the government has raised the bar for employers in an attempt to safeguard American jobs. The drop in denial and RFE rates in the H-1B category between 2009 and 2011 indicates that practitioners are responding and adjusting to the new standards of proof. The fact that the rates of denial under PERM and H-1B are only higher by 5% and 6%, respectively, suggests that despite the heightened standard of proof, the government has not gone on an exclusionary war against business immigration. The bulk of these applications and petitions are still approved, despite audits and requests for evidence. In a way, this development does not mean that the system is necessarily flawed but, to the contrary, that it has been able to adapt to the economic conditions in the country without completely barring an employer’s ability to retain qualified foreign workers that make significant contributions to the U.S. Even though the economy has not recovered completely, the relatively small difference in denial rates for PERM applications and H-1B petitions suggests that practitioners are adapting and responding accordingly.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 12Jun
    Green Card News, Immigration Reform Comments Off on To STEM Or Not To STEM The Tide of Technology?

    Last month, Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas), the senior Republican on the Immigration, Refugees, and Border Security Subcommittee, introduced a proposal called the “Securing the Talent America Requires for the 21st Century Act”, or the STAR Act. The legislation was designed to allocate 55,000 visas a year for students who earn master’s or doctoral degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (more commonly referred to as “STEM” graduates). The emphasis on granting such graduates the opportunity to remain in the United States is understandable as foreign students make up approximately half, if not more, of the recipients of master’s and Ph.D’s in STEM-related fields. Indeed, according to the National Science Foundation, foreign students earned 57% of all engineering doctorates, 54% of all computer science degrees, and 51% of physics doctoral degrees in 2009.

    Proponents of the bill suggest that the lack of a solid immigration policy is causing the nation to lose many of the world’s best minds—entrepreneurs and job creators—to competitors abroad. Currently, many foreign technology graduates work in the U.S. on a temporary basis with the assistance of the H-1B program. But because H-1B visas are only valid for an aggregate of six years (unless certain other conditions are met, i.e. the employer has timely started green card process for the employee), many foreign graduates are forced to return to their native countries.

    For nearly a decade, both technology companies and immigration advocates have demanded an easier solution for workers with advanced degrees to remain in the country, contending that there are not enough domestic technology workers to meet their needs. The STAR Act suggests one solution to the shortcomings of the H-1B visa and securing foreign STEM graduates in the United States. That is, the STAR Act aims to replace 55,000 diversity visas currently available to individuals from countries with low rates of immigration with 55,000 STEM graduates. Simply put, Cornyn’s bill is based on his belief that the green card lottery (otherwise known as the Diversity Lottery) “needs to be dumped for a ‘merit based approach’ to immigration in which the nations’ economic needs are considered when granting green cards.”

    Senator Cornyn’s bill has garnered significant support from universities and high-tech companies all over the country. However, as of yet, it is unclear whether conservative Republicans will support the bill, though it is likely that the Democrats who currently make up the Senate majority will oppose the legislation.

    Criticism surrounding the STAR Act comes from a variety of interest groups. Some critics are concerned that such a program would harm U.S. technology workers by increasing job competition, displacing the unemployed U.S. technology workers, and promoting age discrimination. Others, meanwhile, are more concerned with the elimination of diversity visas under the STAR Act, suggesting that the value of ethnic diversity should not be undermined because diversity strengthens the country in different ways. More criticism comes from yet another angle as “Dreamers” disparage the act for ignoring the group of undocumented students who have grown up in the U.S. and could themselves constitute STEM graduates within the country. And still, there are others who are concerned that the bill would mark the beginning of a new form of immigration abuse – the creation of “diploma mills” aimed at foreign nationals who want permanent residency status.

    Senator Cornyn’s proposal comes amidst a wave of bipartisan efforts to increase the number of permanent visas available for STEM graduates, signaling a nationwide concern for American global competitiveness in these fields. Both Republicans and Democrats have introduced a number of bills in the month of May alone. Notably, U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) introduced Startup Act 2.0 that seeks to allow green card availability for advanced degree STEM graduates. Senator Coons also co-sponsored a green card STEM bill with Senator Lamar Alexandar (R-Tenn.). In the House, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal) introduced a Democrat-only green card bill and Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) introduced a Republican version of the same bill.

    The flurry of legislative activity more than suggests a growing belief that the U.S. needs to make it easier for a foreign student with an advanced STEM degree to remain in this country, though the bills differ as to how they aim to facilitate the process. Proponents of such bills, including President Obama, state that such action is necessary in order to maintain American leadership in the technological field. In this atmosphere, it is likely that more bills are going to arise, though it is unlikely that any such bill will be approved this year (at least before the election). Although both Republicans and Democrats have demonstrated a belief in a need for change in the immigration policy, pursuit of reform is often tied to other more contentious issues such as amnesty, border security, and a path to citizenship and, of course, re-election campaigns for both sides.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • 11Jun
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on H-1B Fiscal Year 2013 Cap Season Update

    As of June 1, 2012, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) had already received 55,600 petitions of the 65,000 available under the H-1B Regular Cap for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2013. USCIS also reported to receive 18,700 petitions of the 20,000 cap for the U.S. Master’s Degree Exemption. Therefore, in just two (2) short months, USCIS has nearly exhausted its entire H-1B quota for 2013. In all likelihood, the cap season will come to a close in a matter of days as the pace of cap-subject H-1B petition filings has picked up precipitously in the last few weeks and days.

    The high numbers of cap-subject petitions received  reflect a significant contrast from last year’s H-1B season. Last season, the cap was open for nearly 8 months after the quota became available. This contrast may suggest an improvement in the U.S. economy, though in prior years, when the economy was more robust, the cap was filled in just a few days.

    It is important to note that the H-1B cap does not affect H-1B extensions of stay and H-1B transfers. Those petitions will continue to be accepted regularly by the USCIS. Similarly, H-1B nonimmigrants who work at (but not necessarily for) eligible research institutions, universities, and other qualifying non-profit facilities may also be excluded from the H-1B visa cap.

    If you have any questions about the H-1B visa cap or would like to discuss appropriate alternatives to the H-1B category, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 29May
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on H-1B Filing Season Quickly Drawing To a Close!

    To our surprise, the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2013 H-1B cap season is quickly coming to a close. After only seven (7) weeks of accepting filings, USCIS recently announced that, as of May 18, approximately 42,000 H-1B cap-subject petitions were receipted. Additionally, USCIS announced that it has receipted 16,000 H-1B petitions for foreign nationals with U.S. advanced degrees.

    When one considers that USCIS has been accepting 4,700 to 6,500 H-1B filings per week since the start of the FY 2013 cap season, it is our prediction that that Congress’ quota of 85,000 cap subject H-1B visas will be exhausted sometime in the next few weeks.  This is a sharp contrast to last H-1B season when the cap was not reached until mid-November.

    With that said, if your business is considering the sponsorship of an H-1B worker subject to the H-1B cap (e.g., a foreign student who is in F-1 status and working pursuant to OPT, or any other foreign national who is not currently or was not previously in H-1B status), you should strongly consider filing such petition as soon as possible before the H-1B visa numbers under the cap are exhausted. Otherwise, you may be left to wait until October 1, 2013 to hire new H-1B workers (when the 2014 H-1B quota becomes available).

    Please note that H-1B visa extensions of stay and H-1B visa transfers (from one eligible U.S. H-1B employer to another) are not subject to the annual H-1B cap and, therefore, will continue to be regularly accepted by USCIS.  Likewise, H-1B nonimmigrants who work at (but not necessarily for) eligible research institutions, universities and other qualifying non-profit facilities may also be excluded from the H-1B visa cap.

    If you have any questions about the H-1B visa cap or would like to discuss appropriate alternatives to the H-1B category, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 02Mar
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on USCIS Will Start Accepting New H-1B Petitions on April 1, 2012

    On April 1, 2012, employers will be eligible to begin filing new H-1B petitions with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for Fiscal Year 2013, which begins October 1, 2012. The quota (more commonly referred to as the “cap”) for new H-1B petitions is 65,000 per year and, of that number, 6,800 visas are automatically set aside for qualified foreign nationals from Chile and Singapore based on Free Trade Agreements with the United States. An additional 20,000 H-1B visas are available to candidates with a U.S. Master’s Degree.

    While last year’s H-1B cap was not reached until late November 2011, there is no telling when this year’s cap will be reached.  Therefore, employers should immediately evaluate their hiring needs for this year and identify any current employees or potential hires for whom H-1B sponsorship would be beneficial.

    Possible candidates for an H-1B visa will most likely fall under one of the following three categories: (i) current employees or new hires with a nonimmigrant status that will not permit them to work continuously through the effective date of a new H-1B classification, October 1, 2012 (i.e., F-1 students working pursuant to OPT, H-3 trainees, and/or J-1 exchange visitors), (ii) potential candidates who are abroad and have not been previously counted against the H-1B cap; or (iii) those employees for whom a change of status is a necessary component to planning your business’ long-term strategy for keeping that employee in the United States (i.e., TN-1 professionals, L-1B specialized knowledge employees, and/or L-1A managers who do not qualify for permanent residence as multinational managers).

    It is important to note that the H-1B cap applies only to “new” H-1B petitions. As such, current H-1B professionals seeking to file an extension of stay, a transfer petition, a petition seeking employment with an institution of higher education, a petition seeking employment with a nonprofit research organization or government research organization, and/or certain petitions for physicians (who previously held J-1 status and have applied for a waiver of the two-year residence requirement based on service in an underserved area) are not subject to the cap. However, should an employer change from an “exempt” employer to a “non-exempt” employer, such change will likely make all such petitions subject to the cap.

    Once employers have identified candidates for H-1B sponsorship under the cap, they should consult with immigration counsel to evaluate whether the offered position and the candidate’s credentials will support an H-1B petition.  Preparation of these H-1B cases should start as soon as possible so that the petition may be filed on Friday, March 30 for a Monday, April 2 delivery with USCIS.

    If you have any questions about the H-1B visa cap, or would like to discuss appropriate alternatives to the H-1B category, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 29Nov
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on USCIS Reaches Fiscal Year 2012 H-1B Cap – The Sign Of A Slightly Improving U.S. Economy?

    USCIS announced on November 23 that it had received a sufficient number of H-1B petitions to reach the statutory cap of 65,000 for the fiscal year (“FY”) 2012 H-1B cap as of November 22, 2011 (the 20,000 “advanced degree” exemption was previously exhausted on October 19).  As such, USCIS will reject all cap-subject petitions for new H-1B specialty occupation workers seeking an employment start date in FY 2012 that were received by USCIS after November 22, 2011.

    As for those petitions filed on November 22, USCIS will apply a computer-generated random selection process to select petitions needed to meet the cap and will reject all remaining cap-subject petitions not randomly selected and will return the petitions with accompanying filing fees.

    Given the exhaustion of H-1B visa numbers for fiscal year 2012, employers are left with no choice but to consider alternative visa options for employing qualified foreign-born professionals. While there are a limited number of options presented from the “alphabet soup” of temporary visa categories available, there are, indeed, viable options for potential hires for whom you cannot (or will not) wait until October 1, 2012 to employ.

    That the H-1B cap for FY 2012 was exhausted more than two (2) months before the cap was met for FY 2011, perhaps the U.S. economy is, in fact, on the rebound despite the headlines you might read elsewhere. Only time will tell…

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 26Oct
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on H-1B Visas Are Still Available!

    After nearly seven months of filings, USCIS has announced that, as of October 14, 2011, approximately 43,300 H-1B cap-subject petitions were receipted.  Additionally, USCIS announced that it has receipted 19,600 H-1B petitions for foreign nationals with advanced degrees.  When comparing those figures to the H-1B numbers from the prior fiscal year, it is our current projection that Congress’ quota of 85,000 cap subject H-1B visas will be exhausted sometime in December 2011.

    With that said, if your business is considering the sponsorship of an H-1B worker subject to the H-1B cap (e.g., a foreign student who is in F-1 status and working pursuant to OPT, or any other foreign national who is not currently or was not previously in H-1B status), you should strongly consider filing such petition sooner rather than later before the H-1B visa numbers are exhausted.  Otherwise, you may be left to wait until October 1, 2012 to hire new H-1B workers (when the 2013 H-1B quota becomes available).

    It is important to note that H-1B visa extensions of stay and H-1B visa transfers (from one eligible U.S. H-1B employer to another) are not subject to the annual H-1B cap and, therefore, are regularly accepted by USCIS.  Likewise, H-1B nonimmigrants who work at (but not necessarily for) eligible research institutions, universities and other qualifying non-profit facilities may also be excluded from the H-1B visa cap and, thus, may not need to concern themselves with the H-1B quota under the cap.

    If you have any questions about the H-1B visa cap, or would like to discuss appropriate alternatives to the H-1B category, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 13Jul
    H-1B Visa News Comments Off on USCIS Updates The H-1B Cap Count

    As of July 1, 2011, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) announced that 19,000 H-1B petitions filed under the regular cap and 12,200 H-1B petitions filed under the U.S. Master’s exemption cap have been received.

    Such reduced H-1B usage is certainly an indication that the U.S. economy continues to struggle.  Indeed, in fiscal year 2007 and 2008, the H-1B cap was used up in the first few days of filing.  In fiscal year 2009, however, with U.S. unemployment peaking at 10.1%, the filing period for new H-1B visas remained open for nearly nine (9) months. Although no one can predict with any certainty whether that will happen again, given the current H-1B usage and the current state of the U.S. economy, we anticipate the H-1B filing window to remain open for the foreseeable future.

    Therefore, this year is another opportunity for employers who, in the past, may have opted not to file H-1B petitions for otherwise eligible workers because of the potential for wasted efforts and resources should the petitions not be selected in the random lottery utilized in prior years.

    The annual cap or quota for new H-1B visas is set by Congress at 65,000 new visas per year, not including the 20,000 H-1B visas available under the U.S. advanced degree cap exemption.  Please note that the cap applies only to petitions for new employment; beneficiaries of H-1B extensions and transfers (from one U.S. employer to another) are not subject to the annual quota.  Additionally, employees of qualified institutions of higher education and certain non-profit or government-sponsored research organizations are typically exempt from the cap.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries   Next Entries »